Shape and evolution of thermostable protein structure

Organisms evolved at high temperatures must maintain their proteins' structures in the face of increased thermal disorder. This challenge results in differences in residue utilization and overall structure. Focusing on thermostable/mesostable pairs of homologous structures, we have examined these differences using novel geometric measures: specifically burial depth (distance from the molecular surface to each atom) and travel depth (distance from the convex hull to the molecular surface that avoids the protein interior). These along with common metrics like packing and Wadell Sphericity are used to gain insight into the constraints experienced by thermophiles. Mean travel depth of hyperthermostable proteins is significantly less than that of their mesostable counterparts, indicating smaller, less numerous and less deep pockets. The mean burial depth of hyperthermostable proteins is significantly higher than that of mesostable proteins indicating that they bury more atoms further from the surface. The burial depth can also be tracked on the individual residue level, adding a finer level of detail to the standard exposed surface area analysis. Hyperthermostable proteins for the first time are shown to be more spherical than their mesostable homologues, regardless of when and how they adapted to extreme temperature. Additionally, residue specific burial depth examinations reveal that charged residues stay unburied, most other residues are slightly more buried and Alanine is more significantly buried in hyperthermostable proteins. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Structural and biochemical basis for polyamine binding to the Tp0655 lipoprotein of Treponema pallidum: putative role for Tp0655 (TpPotD) as a polyamine receptor

Tp0655 of Treponema pallidum, the causative agent of syphilis, is predicted to be a 40 kDa membrane lipoprotein. Previous sequence analysis of Tp0655 noted its homology to polyamine-binding proteins of the bacterial PotD family, which serve as periplasmic ligand-binding proteins of ATP-binding-cassette (ABC) transport systems. Here, the 1.8 A crystal structure of Tp0655 demonstrated structural homology to Escherichia coli PotD and PotF. The latter two proteins preferentially bind spermidine and putrescine, respectively. All of these proteins contain two domains that sandwich the ligand between them. The ligand-binding site of Tp0655 can be occupied by 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfanoic acid, a component of the crystallization medium. To discern the polyamine binding preferences of Tp0655, the protein was subjected to isothermal titration calorimetric experiments. The titrations established that Tp0655 binds polyamines avidly, with a marked preference for putrescine (Kd=10 nM) over spermidine (Kd=430 nM), but the related compounds cadaverine and spermine did not bind. Structural comparisons and structure-based sequence analyses provide insights into how polyamine-binding proteins recognize their ligands. In particular, these comparisons allow the derivation of rules that may be used to predict the function of other members of the PotD family. The sequential, structural, and functional homology of Tp0655 to PotD and PotF prompt the conclusion that the former likely is the polyamine-binding component of an ABC-type polyamine transport system in T. pallidum. We thus rename Tp0655 as TpPotD. The ramifications of TpPotD as a polyamine-binding protein to the parasitic strategy of T. pallidum are discussed.     

ERRgamma tethers strongly bisphenol A and 4-alpha-cumylphenol in an induced-fit manner

A receptor-binding assay and X-ray crystal structure analysis demonstrated that the endocrine disruptor bisphenol A (BPA) strongly binds to human estrogen-related receptor γ (ERRγ). BPA is well anchored to the ligand-binding pocket, forming hydrogen bonds with its two phenol-hydroxyl groups. In this study, we found that 4-α-cumylphenol lacking one of its phenol-hydroxyl groups also binds to ERRγ very strongly. The 2.0 Å crystal structure of the 4-α-cumylphenol/ERRγ complex clearly revealed that ERRγ’s Leu345-β-isopropyl plays a role in the tight binding of 4-α-cumylphenol and BPA, rotating in a back-and-forth induced-fit manner.     

Strategies to search and design stabilizers of protein-protein interactions: a feasibility study

Since protein-protein interactions play a pivotal role in the communication on the molecular level in virtually every biological system and process, the search and design for modulators of such interactions is of utmost importance. In recent years many inhibitors for specific protein-protein interactions have been developed, however, in only a few cases, small and druglike molecules are able to interfere in the complex formation of proteins. On the other hand, there are several small molecules known to modulate protein-protein interactions by means of stabilizing an already assembled complex. To achieve this goal, a ligand is binding to a pocket, which is located rim-exposed at the interface of the interacting proteins, for example as the phytotoxin Fusicoccin, which stabilizes the interaction of plant H+-ATPase and 14-3-3 protein by nearly a factor of 100. To suggest alternative leads, we performed a virtual screening campaign to discover new molecules putatively stabilizing this complex. Furthermore, we screen a dataset of 198 transient recognition protein-protein complexes for cavities, which are located rim-exposed at their interfaces. We provide evidence for high similarity between such rim-exposed cavities and usual ligands accommodating active sites of enzymes. This analysis suggests that rim-exposed cavities at protein-protein interfaces are druggable binding sites. Therefore, the principle of stabilizing protein-protein interactions seems to be a promising alternative to the approach of the competitive inhibition of such interactions by small molecules.     

Structure basis of bigelovin as a selective RXR agonist with a distinct binding mode

The nuclear receptor retinoid X receptor (RXR) functions potently in the regulation of homeostasis and cell development, while rexinoids as RXR agonists have proved their therapeutic potential in the treatment of metabolic diseases and cancer. Here, the natural product bigelovin was identified as a selective RXRα agonist. Interestingly, this compound could not transactivate RXRα:RXRα homodimer but could enhance the transactivation of RXRα:peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ heterodimer and repress that of RXRα:liver X receptor (LXR) α heterodimer, while it had no effects on RXRα:farnesoid X receptor heterodimer. Considering that the effective role of LXR response element involved transactivation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c mediated by RXRα:LXRα in triglyceride elevation, such LXR response element repressing by bigelovin has obviously addressed its potency for further research. Moreover, our determined crystal structure of the bigelovin-activated RXRα ligand-binding domain with the coactivator human steroid receptor coactivator-1 peptide revealed that bigelovin adopted a distinct binding mode. Compared with the known RXR ligands, bigelovin lacks the acidic moiety in structure, which indicated that the acidic moiety rendered little effects on RXR activation. Our results have thereby provided new insights into the structure-based selective rexinoids design with bigelovin as a potential lead compound.     

Structural insight into the specific interaction between murine SHPS-1/SIRP alpha and its ligand CD47

SRC homology 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase substrate 1 (SHPS-1 or SIRPα/BIT) is an immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily transmembrane receptor and a member of the signal regulatory protein (SIRP) family involved in cell-cell interaction. SHPS-1 binds to its ligand CD47 to relay an inhibitory signal for cellular responses, whereas SIRPβ, an activating member of the same family, does not bind to CD47 despite sharing a highly homologous ligand-binding domain with SHPS-1. To address the molecular basis for specific CD47 recognition by SHPS-1, we present the crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of murine SHPS-1 (mSHPS-1). Folding topology revealed that mSHPS-1 adopts an I2-set Ig fold, but its overall structure resembles IgV domains of antigen receptors, although it has an extended loop structure (C′E loop), which forms a dimer interface in the crystal. Site-directed mutagenesis studies of mSHPS-1 identified critical residues for CD47 binding including sites in the C′E loop and regions corresponding to complementarity-determining regions of antigen receptors. The structural and functional features of mSHPS-1 are consistent with the human SHPS-1 structure except that human SHPS-1 has an additional β-strand D. These results suggest that the variable complementarity-determining region-like loop structures in the binding surface of SHPS-1 are generally required for ligand recognition in a manner similar to that of antigen receptors, which may explain the diverse ligand-binding specificities of SIRP family receptors.     

Molecular determinants of the interactions between SRC-1 and LXR/RXR heterodimers

Liver X receptor (LXR)/retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimers have been shown to perform critical functions in cholesterol and lipid metabolism. Here, we have conducted a comparative analysis of the contributions of LXR and RXR binding to steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), which contains three copies of the NR box. We demonstrated that the coactivator-binding surface of LXR, but not that of RXR, is critically important for physical and functional interactions with SRC-1, thereby confirming that RXR functions as an allosteric activator of SRC-1-LXR interaction. Notably, we identified NR box-2 and -3 as the essential binding targets for the SRC-1-induced stimulation of LXR transactivity, and observed the competitive in vitro binding of NR box-2 and -3 to LXR.

Structured summary

MINT-7986678, MINT-7986639, MINT-7986700, MINT-7986720, MINT-7986736, MINT-7986760, MINT-7986787: LXR (uniprotkb:Q13133) physically interacts (MI:0915) with SRC1 (uniprotkb:Q15788) and RXR (uniprotkb:P19793) by pull down (MI:0096)MINT-7986596, MINT-7986621: SRC1 (uniprotkb:Q15788) physically interacts (MI:0915) with LXR (uniprotkb:Q13133) by pull down (MI:0096)MINT-7986555, MINT-7986575: LXR (uniprotkb:Q13133) physically interacts (MI:0915) with SRC1 (uniprotkb:Q15788) by two hybrid (MI:0018)MINT-7986808, MINT-7986907, MINT-7986890: SRC1 (uniprotkb:Q15788) binds (MI:0407) to LXR (uniprotkb:Q13133) by pull down (MI:0096)MINT-7986822, MINT-7986848, MINT-7986865: SRC1 (uniprotkb:Q15788) binds (MI:0407) to RXR (uniprotkb:P19793) by pull down (MI:0096)